|
KMID : 1020220110110060951
|
|
Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene
2011 Volume.11 No. 6 p.951 ~ p.959
|
|
|
The effects of behavior of preventive treatment on job satisfaction in dental hygienist
|
|
So Mi-Hyun
Kim Sun-Sook
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objectives: The author has studied the effects of behavior of preventive treatment on job satisfaction in dental
hygienist.
Methods: The hygienists who had worked from June 27th to August 1st in 2011 were explained about this research objectives and only the hygienists who agreed with this research participation were conducted a selfadministered Questionnaire survey and the results were collected immediately. The collected questionnaire was 297, but the final 250 questionnaire were decided as a target except for the trustless ones. This analysis was extracted using SPSS(SPSS 12.0 for windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).
Results: 1. Preventive treatment of dental hygienist was shown as this order - Educational needs 4.25, mportance 4.12, Usefulness 4.09, Perform 3.42. Job satisfaction was reached the moderate level. 2. Analysis of preventive
treatment of hygienist was shown as this order - Basic brushing education 4.72 was ranked the highest, Taking patient history and Incremental dental health care 4.58 was held the second place. Dental caries activity tests 3.30 was shown the lowest figures. Response of preventive treatment conducting was like this order - Taking patient history 4.30, Dental prophylaxis 4.28, Basic brushing education 4.11, Incremental dental health care 4.04. Dental caries activity tests 2.05 was shown the lowest figures. 3. General characteristics in behavior of preventive treatment was resulted in this case that the respondents who have worked for less one year in current job than the ones who have worked for more than five years was shown such a low level, this was taken as a meaningful difference.(p=0.008) 4. It was shown that the higher fulfillment
of preventive treatment(β=0.340, p<0.001) and the greater earnings(β=0.194, p=0.001) and usefulness of preventive treatment(β=0.130, p=0.042), the higher job satisfaction.
Conclusion: Considering these results, environment where the hygienists can concentrate on preventive treatment which is their proper job should be built up as soon as possible. And through this environment, the atmosphere
where hygienists, as oral health professionals, can play a role to improve the oral health of the people by boosting job satisfaction should be created. Also It is thought that an institutional, actual improvement-changing the social awareness towards hygienists and dentists, the recognition of scope of the hygienists’work - should be established urgently.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
dental hygienist, job satisfaction, preventive treatment
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|